Senators Fail to Stop NLRB's Harmful Ambush Elections Rule. Manufacturers were disappointed on Tuesday, April 24, when the Senate rejected (along party lines) Sen. Michael Enzi's (R-WY) resolution to disapprove the National Labor Relations Board’s (NLRB) "ambush elections" rule. S.J. Res. 36 was rejected by a vote of 45-54. Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) was the only Republican to vote with the Democrats to defeat the measure.
Under current law, the median number of days it takes to hold a union representation election is 38 days. This provides enough time for employees to educate themselves and make informed decisions about whether they wish to join a union or not. The NLRB’s new regulation, finalized in December and scheduled to take effect on Monday, April 30, shortens the time frame for union certification elections to 20 days—constraining employers’ ability to inform their employees about a pending election. It will strip employers of their right to have certain pre-election disputes adjudicated until after the election has taken place.
Ambush elections also are bad news for employees. By shortening the time before a union election, workers will be less likely to get all the facts essential to making such an important decision. The ambush rule is yet another example of NLRB overregulation and places an undue burden on employers and employees alike.
The NAM key voted Sen. Enzi's measure and, along with the National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB), issued online and radio ads in targeted states ahead of the Senate vote. The ads highlight that rather than enforce existing rules, the NLRB is imposing new regulations like ambush elections, overturning decades of labor laws to benefit special interests at the expense of hard working taxpayers. Prior to the vote, NAM Senior Vice President of Policy and Government Relations Aric Newhouse issued a statement in support of S.J. Res. 36.